AI Summary: The meeting was attended by a diverse group of academics, researchers, and practitioners discussing authoring in XR, with particular focus on spatial aspects and memory palaces. The discussion was moderated by Dene Grigar and included presentations and interactive discussions about how to conceptualize and implement text and knowledge representation in XR spaces.
Frode Hegland, Dene Grigar, Rob Swigart, Christopher Gutteridge, Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont, Karl Smink, Mark Anderson, Fabien Benetou, Peter Wasilko, Chris Gebhardt, Abhirami Kumar, Leon van Kammen
AI: Summary
The meeting focused on conceptualizing authoring in XR environments, particularly examining how to structure and interact with textual and knowledge elements in spatial contexts. Key discussions centered around memory palaces, spatial hypertext, and the balance between structured and exploratory approaches. The group debated whether to focus on present technological limitations or future possibilities, with emphasis on the importance of avoiding premature formalization while still providing useful initial frameworks for interaction. Multiple perspectives were shared on how to represent and manipulate information in XR spaces, from simple floating elements to complex spatial arrangements.
AI: Speaker Summary
Frode Hegland
emphasized the importance of moving beyond current hardware limitations and traditional frames of reference, advocating for flexible viewing options and the ability to hide/show elements. He stressed the need for both practical writing environments and innovative spatial representations.
Dene Grigar
Moderated the discussion and emphasized the importance of balancing present capabilities with future possibilities. She discussed the evolution of text and reading practices, highlighting the need to consider both skeuomorphic and abstract approaches to XR environments.
Rob Swigart
Suggested using metaphors like eggs and animals for knowledge containers, proposing visual and auditory cues for information organization. He discussed the importance of timeline visualization using color spectrums.
Christopher Gutteridge
Provided insights about real-world object integration in AR and discussed the importance of metadata for real objects in virtual spaces. He emphasized practical approaches to implementing ideas using AI assistance.
Mark Anderson
Emphasized avoiding premature formalization and the importance of maintaining plasticity in XR spaces. He discussed the distinction between exploratory and presentation modes in hypertext.
Fabien Benetou
Shared practical experience with memory palaces in VR, discussing both benefits (permanence, focus) and challenges (design effort, efficiency). He emphasized the importance of being willing to rebuild and iterate.
Karl Smink
Provided insights about memory psychology, discussing recall versus recognition memory and the importance of context in learning. He emphasized user freedom in workflow optimization.
Peter Wasilko
Discussed the importance of metadata visualization and error correction mechanisms. He emphasized the need for outline building and reorganization capabilities in VR.
Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont
Emphasized the importance of memory palaces and spatial navigation in VR, discussing how space affects memory and association.
Chris Gebhardt
Focused on technical aspects and distributed/decentralized approaches to information organization.
Abhirami Kumar
Participated in discussions about experimental narratives and textuality.
Leon van Kammen
Discussed multimedia elements and compared the concept to game inventories.
AI: Topics Discussed
WebXR:
Minimal direct discussion, though Fabien Benetou mentioned some technical aspects of implementation
Referenced in context of development possibilities
Gestures:
Discussion of embodied controls and interaction methods
Mention of military-style interface gestures
Consideration of using whole arm movements for interaction
Symposium:
Brief mention of Fabien’s presentation at the Future of Text Symposium
Book:
Discussion of plans to review essays in the book during February meetings
Mentioned as part of the record-keeping process
Referenced in context of future contributions
Timelines:
Rob Swigart suggested using visual spectrum for timeline representation
Peter Wasilko discussed multiple parallel notions of time in documentation
Discussion of event occurrence time vs documentation time
Other Topics Discussed:
Memory Palaces in XR
Spatial hypertext
Metadata and object awareness
User interface design principles
Academic citation requirements
Skeuomorphic vs abstract design approaches
Writing environments and interaction methods
Document structure and navigation
Information visualization
Collaborative spaces
Interesting Anecdotes:
Fabien shared an anecdote about learning language through repetition
Dene shared experience with supernatural VR workout environment
Christopher mentioned Frode putting VR headsets on him
AI: Concepts Introduced
Memory Palace: Discussed by multiple participants, particularly Gabriel and Fabien, as a spatial method for organizing information
Spatial Hypertext: Defined by Mark Anderson as allowing multiple narratives to be sustained
Recognition vs Recall Memory: Defined by Karl Smink as two distinct types of memory processes
Chording: Explained by Karl Smink as pressing multiple keys to produce a single output
Murder Wall: Referenced by Frode as an alternative term for spatial information organization
Active Reading: Introduced as a fundamental concept for academic writing process
AI: People Mentioned
Doug Engelbart, mentioned by Gabriel regarding interface design
Bob Horn, mentioned by Frode regarding hypertext mapping
Homer, mentioned by Dene regarding historical context of books
Mark Bernstein, mentioned by Peter regarding hypertext community influence
Bill Viola, mentioned by Dene regarding video art installation
David Kolb, mentioned by Dene regarding hypertext preservation work
AI: Product or Company Names Mentioned
Meta, mentioned regarding VR headset
Microsoft, mentioned regarding word processing
Google, mentioned regarding document sharing
Apple, mentioned in context of future technology ownership
Supernatural VR, mentioned by Dene regarding workout experience
Tinderbox, mentioned by Peter regarding software capabilities
A-Frame, mentioned in technical discussion
Unity, mentioned regarding development platforms
Unreal Engine, mentioned regarding development platforms
Twine, mentioned regarding development platforms
LaTeX, mentioned regarding typesetting environments
AI: Other
The meeting demonstrated a strong emphasis on balancing theoretical possibilities with practical implementations. There was a notable tension between the desire to avoid premature constraints while still providing useful initial frameworks for authoring in XR. The discussion showed how the group is actively working to bridge current technological capabilities with future possibilities while maintaining academic rigor.
Chat Log URLs:
https://seed.hyper.media
https://futuretextlab.info/2024/12/18/jan-27-2025-authoring-in-xr/
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MqDbtJWndFfpc9wIDbx7Wkv7y2P8InQWqSZLuN00t0I/edit?usp=sharing
https://protege.stanford.edu/
https://linguisticator.com/p/munxvr
https://video.benetou.fr/w/nNGSDDooExW3LStiEWZuDs
https://ryanschultz.com/2019/07/29/virtual-memory-palaces-combining-an-ancient-memory-technique-with-modern-vr/
https://tecfa.unige.ch/moo/book2/node43.html#SECTION03121000000000000000
https://www.matrise.no/2020/06/virtual-reality-memory-palaces/
https://futuretextlab.info
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nickross4444_xr-xrdesignchallenge-immersiveinsiders-activity-7288003073887612929-JYmy
Chat Log Summary:
The chat log showed active engagement from participants, sharing relevant resources and responding to each other’s ideas. There was significant discussion about memory palaces, spatial organization, and technical implementation details. Participants shared numerous relevant URLs and expressed agreement or appreciation through reactions. The chat also included important clarifications about concepts like chording and technical implementations.
Why the topic of the future of spaces in XR is important:
The future of spaces in XR is crucial because it represents a fundamental shift in how we interact with and organize information. As we move beyond traditional 2D frames and screens, we need to develop new paradigms for authoring, reading, and organizing knowledge. This has implications for:
- Academic work and knowledge preservation
- How we structure and access information
- The future of human-computer interaction
- Educational methods and learning environments
- Collaborative work and shared understanding
- The evolution of writing and reading practices
- The preservation and accessibility of knowledge
- The development of new tools for thinking and communication
The discussion highlighted how this transition requires careful consideration of human cognitive capabilities, technical possibilities, and practical implementations while avoiding the limitations of current technological constraints or traditional paradigms.
1 comment